Hello , I am an ex Scientologist , this blog is primarily about that but I may address other topics as the mood hits me to . I was in Scientology for 25 years and spent about 10,000 hours using the indoctrination and thought reform method "study tech " . I also spent time on staff and met hundreds of Scientologists and did hundreds of the cult practices . Many were the "ethics cycles and OW writeups " that really are an attempt to suppress or remove a person's identity and replace it with a mental pseudo clone of Ron Hubbard . To make a fanatical slave for the cult .

I looked outside the cult for answers in about January 2014 and left the cult in about March of 2014 . While in about 99% of members have no idea of the truth .

We are told we are in a mental therapy or spiritual enhancement or religion or science for helping people unlock potential . Or any of several other fronts that all pretend kind and humanitarian goals .

The truth is Scientology is a terrorist mind control cult and this blog is my attempt to understand and expose that . And try to state as clearly as possible the tools that I have found helpful in dealing with this .

Thursday, October 5, 2017

SECRET PARIAH - Scientologists Among Us

Recently several people that have been on Leah Remini's Scientology And The Aftermath T.V. show have been described as intelligent, articulate and even successful.

Journalist Tony Ortega has pointed out that people we see on T.V. are selected for effectiveness at communication. He has interviewed probably hundreds of Scientologists and ex Scientologists. He writes a daily blog and has covered Scientology for many years. He has probably written over a thousand stories on Scientology. I believe he is correct in his statement.

Many, many more people that leave Scientology wouldn't be as successful in appearing on T.V. and a good proportion of ex Scientologists don't tell people they were ever in Scientology.

A good number of people that leave Scientology, or other cults, tell as few people as possible and often try to hide it from employers and everyone they meet in the future. It's not something you will see on shows or videos about Scientology.

Some people feel ashamed, embarrassed or deeply confused, both about having been in Scientology and about the way people would treat them if they knew. Scientology has a much higher profile than it did years ago and a simply terrible reputation.

I have run into people that don't know I was in Scientology that can bring it up whenever crazy people or kooky ideas or strange groups are discussed at all. The universal opinion reflects a belief that Scientologists are crazy, gullible, stupid and almost inhuman in how bizarre they are.

Facing that can be fearsome. Instant ostracism and permanent shunning or at least suspicion can accompany the admission of having been in Scientology. Most Scientologists that were in for years or decades will face a significant challenge in proving their stability and good judgment since their sanity will be thrown into doubt.

People that are not well informed regarding cults and coercive persuasion will usually simply not comprehend how any sane, rational, decent person could get in or stay in Scientology.

The worst situation might be dealing with someone that has no real understanding of cults or Scientology and just thinks of cults as spontaneous communities of insane people that somehow magically find another. For some of them the world is black and white, good people that don't join cults and people that do join cults. To some anyone that joins a cult is a Charlie Manson or real life Hannibal Lecter. They just see cult members as deranged killers. A bit more reasonable people see cult members as insane and gullible.

You can exhaust your imagination trying to find the range of prejudices and reactions people will display towards cult members and ex members. You probably won't possibly predict every reaction or opinion.

It's something that breaks social convention. We are not prepared to understand, let alone meet, actual cult members.

So, the standard reactions many people display include incredulity, shunning and mocking. It's not pleasant at all.

Many members of other groups hide their affiliation after they leave. Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, gang members, white supremacists, terrorists, ex cons, formerly homeless people, former sex workers and many other people try to hide the past if it won't be accepted.

I have met people that were shocked to learn I EVER was homeless. People I met in my thirties or forties just couldn't fathom that a person who they saw holding a steady job and fitting into society at any time was homeless. I simply explained that it happened, I ended up getting somewhere to stay and ended up getting employment and decades later these people met me while I was steadily employed at one job for several years.

If someone cannot accept that formerly homeless people can ever under any circumstances function in society, how can they have the open mind required to honestly look at an ex Scientologist as an individual ?

Some people are extremely kind and not prejudiced in dealing with ex Scientologists, but the people that aren't can create a huge problem. It can destabilize or endanger employment, after all a coworker can say things about Scientology and an ex Scientologist that might not be accepted or believed about a normal person.

And someone close can hurt you too. If you start a friendship or romantic relationship with someone and decide to open up and reveal your darkest secrets you become incredibly vulnerable to them, both emotionally and socially.

Some people will hurt you in asking questions or trying to be supportive because they don't understand Scientology or cults or recovery or aspects of you. It's a door you can't close once you open it.

Many cult experts have written about this from Margaret Singer to Daniel Shaw. It's a universal obstacle.

Even the people that publicly discuss it and do videos and interviews can face discrimination and aren't immune to emotional effects from the actions of others.

Some people have given the advice to all exes that aren't publicly known to leave Scientology, never look back and never tell anyone you were ever in. Act like it simply never occurred.

I don't think that's right for everyone, but can't rule it out for anyone either. It's your own life and choice and for some people it may be the best option.

But it's important that whether it's a good move or not isn't the point here. The point is many thousands of people that leave Scientology aren't running around with SP for life T shirts or Ask Me About Xenu hats. Lots of them tell only a few people, sometimes only family that already knew they had joined Scientology.

It's important to know if you read about Scientology or any cult that usually many people that leave will have a silent presence and simply pass for normal, on purpose.

Scientology has hurt thousands of people who you will never see on a video or T.V. show. That's important to know.

Some fear the terrible fair game campaigns OSA is infamous for, some people simply don't want to ever be around Scientologists again, even ex Scientologists.

It's important to know that these people are out here. Some write on Facebook or post comments at The Underground Bunker (a blog on Scientology) or the Ex Scientologist Message Board - ESMB, or elsewhere.

Some of these people only admit being in Scientology through an anonymous online presence and never bring it up elsewhere. It's a vast spectrum.

I think it's important people know about the people that are hidden after they leave Scientology. They are right around you and often completely unseen.

Saturday, September 30, 2017

Why Lying And Murder Are Justified In Scientology Part 1, 2 & 3

Why Lying And Murder Are Justified In Scientology Part 1

Image result for Lying  in ScientologyImage result for Lying  in Scientology

To understand the excuses Hubbard laid out for the tragi-comic policies  he issued you need to, in my opinion, understand some basic Scientology doctrine. In the Way To Happiness Hubbard said not to tell HARMFUL lies, just as he in policy encouraged acceptable truths.

“Do not tell harmful lies.”

Ron Hubbard, The Way to Happiness”

"THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN CONTROL PEOPLE IS TO LIE TO THEM. You can write that down in your book in great big letters. The only way you can control anybody is to lie to them."
. Ron Hubbard, "Off the Time Track," lecture of June 1952, excerpted in JOURNAL OF SCIENTOLOGY
issue 18-G, reprinted in TECHNICAL VOLUMES OF DIANETICS & SCIENTOLOGY, vol. 1, p. 418

Purpose: To train the student to give a false statement with good TR-1. To train the student to outflow false data effectively. … The student should be coached on a gradient until he/she can lie facilely.”
Ron Hubbard, Intelligence Specialist Training Routine—Lying (TR-L)

“Handling truth is a touchy business also. You don’t have to tell everything you know — that would jam the comm line too. Tell an acceptable truth. … So PR becomes the technique of communicating an acceptable truth — and which will attain the desirable result.”
Ron Hubbard, HCOPL 13 August 1970 Issue II PR Series 2, in the Volunteer Minister’s Handbook

“Purpose: To train a PRO to give a ‘no answer’ to questions he has no wish to answer directly. …The trick is to appear to answer the question by giving generalized statements in simple terms so that the reporter doesn’t realize his question hasn’t been answered. … “Purpose: To train a PRO to be able to establish Ethics presence over an SP reporter if the occasion arises, by such things as shouting, banging, pointing, swearing. To do this completely causatively until the poor reporter is ‘caved in’. … “Purpose: To train the PRO to handle an SP reporter by word alone without the use of force as in (a). He uses the word as a rapier and plunges it at the reporter, so that the reporter introverts and drops the question.”
Ron Hubbard, HCOB 10 December 1969,Training Routines”

“Now you say you have to be absolutely truthful. Sincerity is the main thing, and truthfulness is the main thing and don’t lie to anybody …and you’ll get ahead. Brother you sure will. You’ll get ahead right on that cycle of action, right toward zero! It’s a trap not being able to prevaricate … This makes life more colorful!”
Ron Hubbard, Philadelphia Doctorate Course, lecture “How to Talk to friends about Scientology.”

The key to focus in on is HARMFUL in the above quote. Who can be harmed without penalty in Scientology ? Who has no rights whatsoever and is to be destroyed ?

Hubbard goes on to say "Do not murder" but he exactly defines murder.

"There is a considerable difference between these two words “kill” and “murder.” A prohibition against all killing would rule out self-defense; it would tend to make it illegal to handle a serpent coiling to strike the baby; it would put a race on a diet of vegetables. I am sure you can see many illustrations of the difficulties raised by a prohibition against all killing.“Murder” is another thing entirely. By definition it means, “The unlawful killing of one (or more) human being by another, especially with malice aforethought.” Ron Hubbard WTH

He specifically ONLY discourages illegal killing.

He goes on to say "Do not harm a person of good will". What decides good will ? Who qualifies and how should you treat people who are not of good will ?

"The violent criminal, the propagandist, the sensation-seeking media all tend to distract one’s attention from the solid, everyday fact that the society would not run at all were it not for the individuals of good will."

Ron Hubbard WTH

So, he decided the media are not of good will, the "propagandist" . Let's look closer at that. ANYONE with ANY message is technically a propagandist. It does not ONLY mean liars and manipulative evil people . That is a modern slant on it but a Democrat may see a Republican as a propagandist and vice versa and a dissident may see BOTH Republicans and Democrats as propagandists within a corrupt system of institutional evil, propping it up. Who's right ? Well, they ALL are - the others ALL try to persuade people , honestly or not, so propagandist can be applied to ANYONE who communicates at all ever.

So, what decides who is of good will or not ? What lies are harmful ? And ultimately what is legal ? Hubbard answered it all - HIM.

Regarding obeying the law
"Somebody some day will say ‘this is illegal.’ By then be sure the orgs [Scientology organizations] say what is legal or not."
. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 4 January 1966, "LRH Relationship to Orgs"

Regarding determining who should be considered a person of good will that deserves rights and to not have killing them classified as murder
"Show me any person who is critical of us and I’ll show you crimes and intended crimes that would stand a magistrate’s hair on end."
Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin, 4 April 1965

So ANYONE who is critical is labeled a criminal and low tone , meaning a suppressive person below 2.0 on his tone scale. How merciful is Hubbard toward people that try Scientology but just don't conform or fit in ?

"When somebody enrolls, consider he or she has joined up for the duration of the universe - never permit an ‘open-minded’ approach... If they enrolled, they’re aboard, and if they’re aboard they’re here on the same terms as the rest of us -win or die in the attempt. Never let them be half minded about being Scientologists... When Mrs. Pattycake comes to us to be taught, turn that wandering doubt in her eye into a fixed, dedicated glare… The proper instruction attitude is, ‘We'd rather have you dead than incapable.’"Ron Hubbard, KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING, 7 February 1965, reissued 27 August 1980

"ENEMY SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed."
Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 18 October 1967
[SP = Suppressive Person a.k.a.critic of Scientology]

"The practice of declaring people FAIR GAME will cease. FAIR GAME may not appear on any Ethics Order. It causes bad public relations. This P/L does not cancel any policy on the treatment or handling of an SP."
Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 21 October 1968, "Cancellation of Fair Game"

"A truly Suppressive Person or group has no rights of any kind and actions taken against them are not punishable." 
Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 1 March 1965, HCO (Division 1)
"Ethics, Suppressive Acts, Suppression of Scientology and

"In any event, any person from 2.0 down on the Tone Scale should not have, in any thinking society, any civil rights of any kind, because by abusing those rights he brings into being arduous and strenuous laws which are oppressive to those who need no such restraints."
Ron Hubbard, SCIENCE OFSURVIVAL, 1989 Ed., p. 145 [The "Tone Scale" is Scientology’s measure of mental and spiritual health.]

"There are only two answers for the handling of people from 2.0 down on the Tone Scale, neither one of which has anything to do with reasoning with them or listening to their justification of their acts. The first is to raise them on the Tone Scale by un-enturbulating some of their theta by any one of the three valid processes. The other is to dispose of them quietly and without sorrow."
Ron Hubbard, SCIENCE OF SURVIVAL, p. 170

"The sudden and abrupt deletion of all individuals occupying the lower bands of the Tone Scale from the social order would result in an almost instant rise in the cultural tone and would interrupt the dwindling spiral into which any society may have entered."
Ron Hubbard, SCIENCE OF SURVIVAL, p. 170

"A Venezuelan dictator once decided to stop leprosy. He saw that most lepers in his country were also beggars. By the simple expedient of collecting and destroying all the beggars in Venezuela an end was put to leprosy in that country."
Ron Hubbard, SCIENCE OF SURVIVAL, p. 171

"Unfortunately, it is all too often true that suppressors to a creative action must be removed before construction and creation takes place. Any person very high on the Tone Scale may level destruction toward a suppressor."
Ron Hubbard, SCIENCE OF SURVIVAL, p. 159

So, within Hubbard's framework Scientology should decide what is legal, Scientology can remove quietly and without sorrow anyone that criticizes it , or Hubbard. Scientology can lie at anytime to control people and his enemies have no rights whatsoever. So, of course as they have no rights and asking for a refund is seen as suppressive, they have no rights to receive any refund . But it is fair in Scientology to deny rights to and lie to a person with no rights ! Simple really.

And remember what he said regarding Scientology's religious status.

" not a religion."
Ron Hubbard, CREATION OF HUMAN ABILITY, 1954, p. 251

And remember the face he at first shows Scientologists, in the beginning.

"There is no more ethical group on this planet than ourselves."
Ron Hubbard, KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING. 7 February 1965, reissued 27 August 1980

"Our organizations are friendly. They are only here to help you."
  Ron Hubbard, "Dianetic Contract" 23 May 1969

"Somebody some day will say ‘this is illegal.’ By then be sure the orgs [Scientology organizations] say what is legal or not."
- Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 4 January 1966, "LRH Relationship to Orgs"

Why Lying And Murder Are Justified In Scientology Part 2


  • The following is a sequel to Why Lying and Murder are Justified in Scientology . It adds more information to expose how Hubbard twists words so some seemingly innocent ideas ultimately twist and turn into dehumanizing some people while praising others. The key is realizing WHO gets to decide which people are raised up and just how low the others are dropped down. 

A civilization without insanity, without criminals and without war, where the able can prosper and honest beings can have rights, and where Man is free to rise to greater heights, are the aims of Scientology
Written by Ron Hubbard in September 1965

People often don't understand what Hubbard meant here. I certainly didn't while I was in Scientology.

First off, he never had any methods to actually help improve sanity or ability, and he knew it. So his only option to remove criminals and the insane was to exterminate them en masse. 

Next he talks of the able prospering and honest beings having rights. What about beings he doesn't consider honest ? He doesn't reserve ANY rights for them !

He talks of man being free to rise to greater heights - but fails to mention how such a rise could occur. Leaving man with a quite nebulous freedom indeed.

But is this all just vague philosophy with no practical applications involving anything real ? After all lots of philosophies have abstract concepts. What matters is concrete actions, particularly involving people and say governments.

In the face of danger from Govts or courts there are only two errors one can make: (a) do nothing and (b) defend. The right things to do with any threat are to (1) Find out if we want to play the offered game or not, (2) If not, to derail the offered game with a feint or attack upon the most vulnerable point. which can be disclosed in the enemy ranks, (3) Make enough threat or clamor to cause the enemy to quail, (4) Don't try to get any money out of it, (5) Make every attack by us also sell Scientology and (6) Win. If attacked on some vulnerable point by anyone or anything or any organization, always find or manufacture enough threat against them to cause them to sue for peace. Peace is bought with an exchange of advantage, so make the advantage and then settle. Don't ever defend. Always attack. Don't ever do nothing. Unexpected attacks in the rear of the enemy's front ranks work best

Here Hubbard specifically said if attacked to find or manufacture evidence and don't ever do nothing. Very specific and leaving no room for discretion or respecting legitimate authorities. 

    The goal of the Department is to bring the government and hostile philosophies or societies into a state of complete compliance with the goals of Scientology. This is done by high level ability to control and in its absence by low level ability to overwhelm. Introvert such agencies. Control such agencies. Scientology is the only game on Earth where everybody wins. There is no overt in bringing good order.

Here Hubbard made it clear he wanted philosophies or societies to be in complete compliance with the goals of Scientology.  And notably he stated there is no overt in bringing good order. In the context of his other statements in the first entry in this series it is clear anything is allowed to be done to anyone Scientology decrees low tones or suppressive persons, meaning anyone unwilling to comply with Scientology's authority.  Anything including lying to or about them or murder. 

“You want to know what happens when you clear everybody in that neighborhood, the only thing that [Scientology] center can become used for is a political center. Because by the time you’ve done all this, you are the government…” —  Ron Hubbard. Taped Lecture – 9 January 1962: Future Org Trends.

Hubbard's goals, Scientology's ultimate goals, were totalitarian. He wanted his creation to take over the entire world and replace all governments.

Once the world is Clear – a nation, a state, a city or a village – the Scientology-organization in the area becomes its government! And once this has taken place the only policy accepted as valid is Scientology policy.” — Ron Hubbard. Taped Lecture – 9 January 1962: Future Org Trends.

He here makes it perfectly clear that all laws of any kind, including any on human rights, are subordinate to Scientology policy - his policy, his ideas.


After you have achieved a high level of ability you will be the first to insist upon your rights to live with honest people.
When you know the technology of the mind, you know that it is a mistake to use “individual rights” and “freedom” as arguments to protect those who would only destroy.
Individual rights were not originated to protect criminals, but to bring freedom to honest men. Into this area of protection then dived those who needed “freedom” and “individual liberty” to cover their own questionable activities.
Freedom is for honest people. No man who is not himself honest can be free—he is his own trap. When his own deeds cannot be disclosed then he is a prisoner; he must withhold himself from his fellows and is a slave to his own conscience. Freedom must be deserved before any freedom is possible.
To protect dishonest people is to condemn them to their own hells. By making “individual rights” a synonym for “protect the criminal” one helps bring about a slave state for all; for where “individual liberty” is abused, an impatience with it arises which at length sweeps us all away. The targets of all disciplinary laws are the few who err. Such laws unfortunately also injure and restrict those who do not err. If all were honest, there would be no disciplinary threats.
By seeking to invoke his “individual rights” to protect himself from an examination of his deeds, he reduces just that much the future of individual liberty—for he himself is not free. Yet he infects others who are honest by using their right to freedom to protect himself.
Uneasy lies the head that wears a guilty conscience. And it will lie no more easily by seeking to protect misdeeds by pleas of “freedom means that you must never look at me.” The right of a person to survive is directly related to his honesty.
Freedom for Man does not mean freedom to injure Man. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom to harm by lies.
Man cannot be free while there are those amongst him who are slaves to their own terrors.

To preserve that freedom, one must not permit men to hide their evil intentions under the protection of that freedom. To be free, a man must be honest with himself and with his fellows. If a man uses his own honesty to protest the unmasking of dishonesty, then that man is an enemy of his own freedom.
We can stand in the sun only so long as we do not let the deeds of others bring the darkness.
Freedom is for honest men. Individual liberty exists only for those who have the ability to be free.
Today, in Scientology, we know the jailer—the person himself. And we can restore the right to stand in the sun by eradicating the evil men do to themselves.
So do not say that an investigation of a person or the past is a step toward slavery. For, in Scientology, such a step is the first step toward freeing a man from the guilt of self.
Were it the intention of the Scientologist to punish the guilty, then and only then would a look into the past of another be wrong.
But we are not police. Our look is the first step toward unlocking the doors—for they are all barred from within.
Who would punish when he could salvage? Only a madman would break a wanted object when he could repair it—and we are not mad.
The individual must not die in this machine age—rights or no rights. The criminal and madman must not triumph with their newfound tools of destruction.
The least free person is the person who cannot reveal his own acts and who protests the revelation of the improper acts of others. On such people will be built a future political slavery where we all have numbers—and our guilt—unless we act.
It is fascinating that blackmail and punishment are the keynotes of all dark operations. What would happen if these two commodities no longer existed? What would happen if all men were free enough to speak? Then and only then would you have freedom.
On the day when we can fully trust each other, there will be peace on Earth.
Don’t stand in the road of that freedom. Be free, yourself.
 Ron Hubbard

The key to understanding the above policy by Hubbard is that the entire use of the terms able and honest when used by Hubbard are arbitrary. They are code words to fool the cult members. They mean people who cooperate with Hubbard, Hubbard's policies and entirely submit to his authority. And are never a danger to Hubbard or his power. They actually are reversals of truth, but hard to understand at first. Able means unable to resist Hubbard's control and certainly unable to see his true intentions. Honest starts by meaning entirely willing to tell anything to Scientology but gradually includes only believing Hubbard's claims, even when, especially when direct observations contradict Hubbard's claims.

Hubbard's brand of honesty is self deception. The right such "honest" men earn is to think, feel and behave exactly as Hubbard demanded.

Hubbard wanted all right to personal privacy revoked for anyone, anyone except of course himself. The fact that information given under the priest penitent privilege is collected for blackmail and often the privilege is revoked to help OSA or the ethics section to investigate or ruin a person. The assurances from Hubbard are simply lies for misdirection. To throw off anyone who can spot the eradication of individual rights and render their warnings powerless.

Finally, Hubbard used a particularly pernicious trick. He said on the day when we can fully trust each other there will be peace on Earth. Well, when is there peace on Earth ? Never, in our world with billions of people in over a hundred countries sadly there is always conflict. So, by his logic we can never fully trust each other.
And if we can never fully trust each other, how much can we trust each other ? But oddly we are supposed to trust Hubbard and only Hubbard.

Hubbard even had promotional materials in his organizations that said "Build trust in yourself, become a trained auditor". So, ultimately your trust in Hubbard is meant to override and overshadow your own judgment and direct observations. Scientology is a non-reality based belief system. With complete obedience, subservience and blind faith in Scientology and Hubbard providing a foundation of lies, denial and dissociation to preserve the absolute iron clad hold Hubbard's methods place upon a mind.

He ultimately wanted the individual to see his authority as justified, any objections as sure signs of hidden evil acts by evil beings unworthy of any rights and complete surrender of rights as honest and ethical. Within a framework of seeing Scientology policy as superior to and eventually replacing all laws. But the immediate acceptance of Scientology as superior to law and from a higher authority makes violating laws entirely justified, and with no laws or Scientology policy safeguarding human rights, are there truly any left at all in Scientology? No, there is an absence of rights accompanied by an illusion, an artificially created persistent delusion, of rights. Totalitarianism disguised as enlightenment. That is Hubbard's gift to the world.

Why Lying And Murder Are Justified In Scientology Part 3

 Image result for ron series scientology observer father of liesImage result for ron series scientology observer father of liesImage result for ron series scientology observer father of lies

Hubbard made his ethics technology an excuse to have people behave in an unethical way to ensure his control over them would be complete.

                         HCO ETHICS ORDER To:        Those Concerned              No. 30 INT
                                        E/O No. 28 INT added to
From:      The Founder
Subject:   RACKET EXPOSED               6th March 1968
(BPI and goes in Auditor)
                         POLLY STATHIS
                         PETER GOODWIN
                         JIM STATHIS
                         PETER KNIGHT
                         MRS. KNIGHT
                         NORA GOODWIN
                         RON FROST
                         MARGARET FROST
                         NINA COLLINGWOOD
                         FREDA GAIMAN
                         FRANK MANLEY
                         MARY ANN TAYLOR
                         GEORGE WATERIDGE
are hereby declared Suppressive Persons for pretending to have and distribute
forged and altered "Upper Level Materials" which were of a Research nature
and not for distribution.
All Certificates and Awards are cancelled.
1.   Having stolen or illegally procured these dangerous materials (at the
     instigation of a Psychiatrist) these persons did plot to misuse them to
     cause Insanity and Death.
2.   False report for money that they would furnish the real materials.
3.   They are declared Enemies of mankind, the planet and all life.
4.   They are fair game.
5.   No amnesty may ever cover them.
6.   If they ever come to a Qual Division they are to be run on reverse
7.   Any Sea Org member contacting any of them is to use Auditing Process
8.   The Criminals Prosecution Bureau is to find any and all crimes in their
     pasts and have them brought to court and prison.
The Public Distribution of False or Forbidden or Dangerous Data is a
Suppressive Act and a High Crime.
                                               L. RON HUBBARD
«R2-45 - an enormously effective process for exteriorization, but its use is frowned upon by this society at this time.» — Ron Hubbard, The Creation of Human Ability
«Exteriorization: The state of the thetan, the individual himself, being outside his body. [...] the state achieved in which the thetan can be outside his body with certainty» — Ron Hubbard, The Phoenix Lectures, 1968

The purpose of Ethics is:
And having accomplished that the purpose becomes
Thus progress can be made by all
Many mechanisms can exist to mask a counter-intention
One has an intention to expand the org. An "expert" says it is difficult as "The building society...." The impules is to then handle the problem presented by the "expert," whereas the correct ETHICS actions is to remove his counter-intentionedness or other-intentionedness. If he were an EXPERT he would simply say, "Okay. I'll handle my end of the expansion."
There are many ways to handle counter- and other-intentionedness
There is a fine lin between Ethics and Tech
The point where a thetan goes mad is very exact. It is the point where he begins to obsessively stop something. From this the effort becomes generalized and he begins to stop lots of other things. When this includes anyone who or anything that would help him as well as thos people and things that help, the being is suppressive. His intentions counter any other intention, particularly good intentions.
Other-intentionedness comes from unawareness or dispersal. It is handled by removing things which disperse others. Offering bottled medicine to cure "the blues" is a direct distraction. It is the purveyor of the distraction who is the target.
The person who enters a Scientology group to then sell other-answer is of course an enemy.
However we go about accomplishing the above is the action of ethics. The above is the purpose.
                                                  RON HUBBARD

"Life bleeds. It suffers. It hungers. And it has to have the right to shoot its enemies until such time as comes a golden age." Ron Hubbard The Responsibilities Of Leaders HCOPL also found in Introduction To Scientology Ethics book
"the foremost law, if one’s ambition is to win, is of course to win."
Ron Hubbard The Responsibilities Of Leaders HCOPL also found in Introduction To Scientology Ethics book
"He doesn’t have to know all the bad news and if he’s a power really, he won’t ask all the time, “What are all those dead bodies doing at the door?” And if you are clever, you never let it be thought HE killed them — that weakens you and also hurts the power source. “Well, boss, about all those dead bodies, nobody at all will suppose you did it. She over there, those pink legs sticking out, didn’t like me.”
Ron Hubbard The Responsibilities Of Leaders HCOPL also found in Introduction To Scientology Ethics book
"always push power in the direction of anyone on whose power you depend. It may be more money for the power or more ease or a snarling defense of the power to a critic or even the dull thud of one of his enemies in the dark or the glorious blaze of the whole enemy camp as a birthday surprise."
Ron Hubbard The Responsibilities Of Leaders HCOPL also found in Introduction To Scientology Ethics book
"In short, a staff member can get away with murder so long as his statistic is up and can't sneeze without a chop if it's down."
HCOPL 1 Sep 1965 (reissued 5 Oct 1985) "Ethics Protection"
"When people do start reporting a staff member with a high statistic, what you investigate is the person who turned in the report. In an ancient army a particularly brave deed was recognized by an award of the title of Kha-Khan. It was not a rank. The person remained what he was, BUT he was entitled to be forgiven the death penalty ten times in case in the future he did anything wrong. That was a Kha-Khan. That's what producing, high-statistic staff members are - Kha-Khans. They can get away with murder without a blink from Ethics.... And Ethics must recognize a Kha-Khan when it sees one - and tear up the bad report chits on the person with a yawn."
HCOPL 1 Sep 1965 (reissued 5 Oct 1985) "Ethics Protection"

I can close with two brief quotes from Hubbard for your consideration.

"Our organizations are friendly. They are only here to help you."
- . Ron Hubbard, "Dianetic Contract" 23 May 1969
"There is no more ethical group on this planet than ourselves."
- Ron Hubbard, KEEPING SCIENTOLOGY WORKING. 7 February 1965, reissued 27 August 1980

"Somebody some day will say ‘this is illegal.’ By then be sure the orgs [Scientology organizations] say what is legal or not."
- Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 4 January 1966, "LRH Relationship to Orgs"

Mockingbird's Greatest Hits
I have reached nearly two hundred posts online and thousands of comments as well. In looking back at all that I realized a very small number of posts have been consistently the most viewed and likely most helpful for people seeking to understand Scientology.

I certainly hope they are helping people. Here I will try to present the short list of the posts that best explain my ideas and can introduce you to information that I hope will help begin beneficial examination of Scientology.

1)Insidious Enslavement: Study Technology

2)Basic Introduction To Hypnosis in Scientology

3)Pissed It's Not Your Fault !!!

4)The Secret Of Scientology Part 1 Control Via Contradiction

5)Burning Down Hell - How Commands Are Hidden, Varied And Repeated To Control You As Hypnotic Implants

6)Why Hubbard Never Claimed OT Feats And The Rock Bottom Basis Of Scientology

7)A Million Years In Hell

8-10)OT III And Beyond: Sources Plagiarized From Part 1, 2 and 3
Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

11)Propaganda By Reversal Of Meaning In Scientology

12)Scientology's Parallel In Nature - Malignant Narcissism

13)OT VIII Delusion Fulfilled

14)There Is No Irony In Scientology

15 - 16)Why Lying And Murder Are Justified In Scientology part 1 and 2

Part 1

Part 2

Why Lying And Murder Are Justified In Scientology part 3

17)Unraveling Scientology - A Missing Vital Ingredient

18)Loving A Lie

19)Two Roads

20)Orders Of Magnitude Part 1

These twenty posts have been both popular and give a very good grounding in many of my ideas on Scientology